Regional Impacts (more...)

The ability of offshore development to create jobs is substantial, though the main concern is what percentage of these jobs would be obtained by residents of coastal communities, other British Columbians, and Canadians. It is difficult to draw conclusions from experience on the East Coast because the location of reserves and extraction methods used are likely be quite different for any BC scenario. However, it is helpful to judge whether or not the experience as a whole has been beneficial for other provinces. The Skeena-Queen Charlotte Region is among the most economically depressed regions of BC and is in need of diversification.

Map illustrating Skeena-Queen Charlotte Region

Expectations

- in regards to employment and financial benefits, many residents of the East Coast claimed that their expectations were not met

  - is it possible that residents of the East Coast had unrealistic expectations?
 

- or was the situation not set up in a manner to benefit residents of the East Coast?

- expectations anywhere in association with the oil and gas industry tend to be based on the positive and negative associated with the industry rather than a balanced portrayal of the potential costs and benefits

 

Lessons Learned from Other Regions

- employment tends to be concentrated by firms in major urban centers

 

- employment falls mainly to men (95%)

 

Regional Profile

- BC coastal communities are experiencing a downturn in traditional resource-based industries

 

- BC Stats shows that the number of residents in these areas receiving government benefits (ie. employment insurance) is well above the provincial average

  - the ability of residents to obtain jobs tends to be dependent on education, which is BC Stats shows is also weaker in these communities
 

- would the oil and gas industry help to revitalize these communities?

 

Further Details

 


References | Offshore Oil & Gas Moratorium | Links | About EnergyBC | © MJ Whiticar, Biogeochemistry